top of page
Search

GRC: The Strategic Compass for Cybersecurity

  • Writer: Laura Sawka
    Laura Sawka
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 4 min read
ree

You’ve implemented the latest industry tools, and the security team is running hard.  Your reporting metrics and sharing dashboards.  You feel like you’ve done “all the things,” but the business isn’t responding, and the team is burning out.  Then it dawns on you, the last time your cybersecurity strategy was refreshed was when you first started.  The strategy is out of date, and the team is operating without a clear compass that links all the work together across the various security domains.  The business lacks clarity on how the security investments support business goals and why additional checks are needed.


You dig up your old strategy document and are reminded that security needs to speak the language of the business and clearly communicate how security supports business objectives.  You see your own scribbled notes, “stop the technical jargon” and “communicate in business terms”.  It’s clearly time for a reset, and that shift begins with elevating GRC as a strategic capability to help you shape the direction of the cybersecurity program.


From Independent Functions to a Strategic Interconnected System


While governance, risk, and compliance functions exist in your organization, they may be treated programmatically as separate functions. If elevated, they should form a single strategic interconnected system that can guide the holistic cybersecurity strategy. Risk management defines the level of risk an organization can tolerate while pursuing its mission. Governance translates that tolerance into clear requirements and accountability. Compliance ensures that the organization operates with integrity and that controls perform as designed.


When these elements are connected, they build momentum. Risk insights guide investment priorities. Governance aligns resources and sets expectations. Compliance ensures that security investments deliver assurance and risk reduction. Continuous monitoring turns this cycle into a living feedback system, where each decision further supports trust.


Implementing the GRC Fly Wheel


The interconnected system gains momentum when each element of GRC is integrated into the cybersecurity strategy as a wrapper integrating the various security domains.


Define a Security Risk Appetite


Cybersecurity is rooted in risk management, which starts with defining the organization’s risk appetite and aligning it with business goals. This appetite should be discussed and agreed with key stakeholders, and clearly linked to business objectives. Accepting more risk than desired may lead to financial, regulatory, or reputational consequences. Aligning the business with risk appetite is essential when making investment decisions and establishing the strategy.


Conduct a Risk Assessment


To manage risk effectively, an organization must first identify the security risks it faces.  Risks originate from threats that can exploit weaknesses or vulnerabilities in an organization’s protections.  The residual risk is the risk that remains for an organization once controls have been applied.  When residual risk exceeds the desired risk level, an organization can decide how to manage it (mitigate, accept, transfer, or avoid).  The decision to mitigate a risk is an investment decision that should be reflected in the cybersecurity strategy.  Risk mitigation is a key driver of investment prioritization and an effective translation layer when communicating the impact of investments on business outcomes to executives and the Board.  A significant portion of the strategy will be comprised of prioritized investment decisions across the security domains to manage risks in support of business objectives.


Establishing Security Policies


To reach the desired security posture, organizations must establish controls to reduce risk to acceptable levels. This is achieved through minimum security requirements that incorporate both internal needs and external compliance frameworks. Policies must be documented, implemented, monitored, and enforced. This can involve integrating controls into business processes or integrating checks and guardrails throughout the software development lifecycle. For effectiveness, policies must go beyond documentation and become part of daily operations, as captured in the strategy.


Monitor Compliance


Compliance provides the visibility needed to know whether controls are designed and operating effectively to mitigate risks and to comply with requirements from external frameworks and internal policies.  Compliance provides the validation layer that the ecosystem is working as intended, and continuous compliance provides this assurance on an ongoing basis.  If issues are identified, they should be tied back to the security risk to communicate the impact and then mitigated to bring the organization back into balance.   Continuous compliance monitoring capabilities to provide the organization with the visibility needed should be incorporated into the cybersecurity strategy.


Measuring Program Effectiveness


Once the security strategy is established, its effectiveness can be measured over time to validate that the investments result in the intended outcome.


Program Maturity


Many organizations rely on program maturity assessments to gauge how advanced their security program is relative to industry benchmarks. These assessments identify alignment with industry peers and highlight areas for improvement. The GRC team is often the steward who manages the assessment, establishes targets, and recommends investments in partnership with the other security leaders that both mitigate risks and increase maturity. Security maturity reporting measures improvement connected to strategy-driven investments.


Key Metrics


Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) provide an effective way for organizations to report on the most critical indicators of a security program's success.  Top KPIs should be consistently reported to executive management and the Board. Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) should also be tracked to continuously monitor key risk thresholds.  As a governance capability, the GRC team is often well-positioned to influence the metrics reported that align with the cybersecurity strategy.


Bringing it all Together


An effective cybersecurity strategy relies on the GRC capabilities as a connective tissue across the security domains. Grounded in risk management, the strategy's investments are prioritized to manage risk and achieve business objectives. Policies formalize these decisions; compliance provides assurance and accountability. Program progress and maturity are measured transparently, demonstrating how security activities align with business goals. When GRC is elevated, it transforms the cybersecurity strategy from siloed security operating domains into a central, unifying force that drives confidence and trusted growth.


Due for a strategy refresh?   Connect with our advisor to learn more about how to elevate your approach.

 
 
Logo

Where Strategy Meets GRC, Growth Follows

400 Monticello Ave Ste 1802

PMB 910458

Norfolk, VA 23510-2670

mem-badge_full_white_blue-band.png

Trusted by organizations who understand that GRC isn't just about box-checking - it's a competitive advantage.

 

© 2025 by Sawka Advisory Group, LLC.  

 

bottom of page